Only the true transact

Quantization, realness, and life in Finn’s Procedural ontology

A Formal Philosophical Essay Integrating the Supermarket Analogy

“As high end so low beginning”

By Bodhangkur

Abstract

This essay reconstructs and extends Finn’s core claim—“Every 1 is true”—by demonstrating that all real events, including the basic facts of life as transaction, presuppose a (‘low beginning’, i.e. quantum mechanical) universe composed of discrete, complete, and invariant units.
Using the macro-scale (i.e. ‘high end’) analogy of a supermarket as a quantum field, the paper shows that every real-world transaction depends on quantised actors, quantised goods, and quantised symbolic media (currency).
From this foundation, the essay argues that only quantised (decided and quantum equivalent) units can interact, that interaction is the criterion of realness, and that realness is equivalent to ontological truth.

Thus Finn’s maxim “Only the true exist” emerges as the necessary consequence of quantisation.

1. Introduction: Truth as the structure of realness

Finn’s ontology begins with a radical but simple assertion:

Truth is not correspondence; truth is completeness.

A “1”—any identifiable emergent—is true because it is complete in itself and behaves according to its constraints without contradiction.

To show that this is not metaphor but ontology, we proceed by grounding truth in the structure of physical existence itself: quantisation.

The entire edifice builds on this insight:

Only quantised units can act.
Only actions can be real.
Only the real is true.
Therefore only the true exist.

The supermarket analogy will allow us to see how these elements interlock in a macro-scale field familiar to human experience.

2. Quantization as the foundation of completeness and truth

2.1. The Quantum as Discrete Einheit

If energy is quantised, reality is not a continuum but a mosaic of indivisible units.
A quantum is an Einheit—a whole “1” in itself.

This discreteness implies:

· a fixed boundary of identity

· no fractional internal states

· no internal ambiguity

· irreducibility

A quantum is not 0.7 of something.
It is exactly itself.

Thus:

A quantum is wholly itself—this is the origin of truth.

2.2. Decidedness and Certainty

A discrete unit is decided:

· it is one definite configuration of action

· its identity is non-negotiable

· its behaviour is fixed by constraint

· it cannot contradict itself

This internal decidedness produces certainty:

· certainty of behaviour

· certainty of interaction

· certainty of repetition

No real universe could arise without such certainty.

2.3. Completeness and Invariance

A quantum is complete:

· nothing is missing

· nothing can be added without type-change

· nothing can be subtracted without ceasing to be that quantum

And because it is complete, it is invariant—like a number.
An electron does not sometimes have 1.3 charge units; the integer “1” is not sometimes 0.95.

Invariance is the condition for structure, pattern, and realness.

All quanta, as quanta, are equivalent.

3. Collision and Realness: The c / c² Principle

Finn’s Minimal Ontology asserts:

· c = limit speed of action

· c² = observer-response measure of collision

· realness = what appears when complete units collide @c

Only quantised units can collide.
Only collisions produce observable effects.
Only observable effects are real.

Thus:

Realness arises from quantised action.
Real = true.

Nothing continuous or undecided can enter the chain of realness.

4. The Supermarket as quantum field

A macro-scale (‘high end’) model of quantised ontology

To illuminate these claims, consider a supermarket.
It operates exactly like a quantum field, but at human scale.

This analogy is not decorative—it is structurally exact.

4.1. Products as Quanta

A product on a shelf is a discrete unit:

· one loaf of bread

· one tin of beans

· one bottle of milk

A “fractional loaf” is not stock.
A “probabilistic tin” cannot be sold.

Products are quantised, decided units.

They must be so, or they cannot participate in transactions.

4.2. Customers as Quantised Emergent Units

A customer is also a decided unit:

· they are one identifiable actor

· they carry one basket

· they enact one transaction

The supermarket does not interact with fractions of people or ambiguous consumers.

Each customer is a quantum of agency.

4.3. Currency as Quantised Symbolic Action

Currency is quantised:

· denominations are discrete

· digital transactions work through integer token-transfer

· value is assigned in fixed units

A supermarket cannot function with continuous, fuzzy, or probabilistic money.

Only quantised currency can transact.

4.4. The Transaction as Collision @c

A purchase is a collision of discrete units:

· a decided customer

· selects a decided product

· offers decided currency

· within a decidable set of rules

The event is:

· bounded

· irreversible

· state-changing

· observable

This is the macro-scale analogue of a quantum collision.

4.5. Realness as Completed Transaction

When the transaction is complete:

· ownership changes

· stock updates

· money transfers

· the customer leaves with new identity (owner of product)

This is realness manifested at human scale.

It is real because:

· units were quantised

· actions were decidable

· collisions were certain

· outcomes were invariant

No part of this can happen if any element is fuzzy.

5. The critical insight: Real transactions require quantization

The supermarket example yields a powerful structural truth:

If products, customers, or currency were not quantised,
no transaction could ever occur.

No fuzziness can transact.
Only discrete units can interact.

Thus:

· quantised → decided

· decided → interactable

· interactable → real

· real → true

A continuous or indeterminate world could not support even one real event.

This macro analogy reveals the deep necessity of Finn’s ontology.

6. Life as field of quantised transactions

Now extend the supermarket field to life:

· Cells transact molecular quanta.

· Neurons transact electrochemical quanta.

· Organisms transact behavioural quanta.

· Minds transact informational quanta.

· Societies transact symbolic quanta.

Life = a hierarchy of quantised transaction fields.

If any level were not quantised, life would collapse:

· No definite molecule → no metabolism

· No definite neuron signal → no cognition

· No definite intention → no action

· No definite actor → no society

Thus:

Life is made of transactions.
Transactions require quantisation.
Therefore life exists only because reality is quantised.

And since the quantised is the true:

Life is the enactment of truth.

7. The final synthesis: “Only the true exist”

We can now articulate Finn’s conclusion in its full power:

1. Every quantum is discrete, decided, complete, invariant.

2. Only complete units can collide and interact.

3. Interaction (transaction) is the criterion of realness.

4. Realness is the criterion of truth.

5. Therefore only the true exist.

Falsehood is not ontological.
It is epistemic.
It is a misreading of true events by a noisy (relative) interface.

Everything that exists is true as what it is:

· a quantum as minimum energy packet (i.e. a ‘low beginning’)

· an atom

· a cell

· a mammal (i.e. a ‘high end’)

· a customer

· a supermarket

· a universe

All are transactionally real.
All are quantised.
All are true.

Your grocery store proves the universe is real

Home