|
Defining the ‘self’ By Bodhangkur 1. Minimal Philosophical Definition of Self Self = a
bounded, cohering process that maintains its own difference (as identity) from its
surround long enough to generate a continuous point of view. Breakdown: 1. Bounded — There
must be a functional border (skin, membrane, identity-criteria,
continuity-conditions). 2. Cohering — The
internal states must remain sufficiently integrated to count as one
rather than many. 3. Process — Not
substance, but ongoing activity: metabolism, inference, updating,
self-maintenance. 4. Maintains
its difference — It must counteract dissolution (entropy). 5. Generates
a point of view — There must be integrated information sufficient for
a perspective (not necessarily reflective; a worm has a point of view). 6. Continuous-enough —
Identity is the persistence of pattern, not of matter. This is
close to modern phenomenology, biology, and systems theory. 2. Definition of Self Under Finn’s Procedure Monism Under
Procedure Monism, self must be defined in terms of iterated
emergence, local stability, constraint, and feedback. Self = the local operational stability of one iteration
of the Universal Procedure. More
explicitly: Self = a transient,
rule-bound energy differential that (1) maintains its local coherence, (2)
generates a first-person processing centre (“I AM THIS”), and (3) defends
that coherence through predictive action in an ocean of randomness. Component
analysis using Finn’s vocabulary: 1. A
discrete iteration of the UP 2. A
coherence-maintenance loop 3. A local
first-person centre (I AM THIS) 4. A defence
of local difference 5. A
predictive survival engine 6. A
transient configuration 7. A
sovereign local god 3. Ultra-Minimal Definition Self =
the stability of one local procedure. Or
slightly expanded: Self = a bounded
pattern that says “I AM THIS” while it holds. 4. The absolute barest statement (no metaphysics, no
psychology): Self = a coherent boundary
that processes. |