|
The Treatise of the Blind System: On Life as
Self-Fulfilment Through Survival The druid
Finn’s view: I. The Premise Every unit
of life—a quantum of nature, such as a human—is a closed-loop automaton. It
is a self-contained, self-serving procedure that adapts to its environment
solely to maintain operational continuity. It is not guided by wisdom,
morality, or meaning. It is not even guided by will. It is governed by
code—blind, biological, yet dynamic. There is
no external purpose. No transcendent goal. The system exists to fulfil itself
in operation. It seeks, through adaptation, to refine its internal data. The
product of that refinement is its sole offering to the future. All other
effects—cultural, emotional, ethical—are secondary, and most often
irrelevant. II. Pain, Pleasure, and Fulfilment Pain and pleasure
are signal outputs of the internal Guide & Control system. They are not
moral. They are not meaningful. They are regulatory pulses—indicators of
deviation (pain) or alignment (pleasure) with the system’s performance
architecture. Suffering
is not a failure. It is information. Attempts to eliminate it as such—as in
ancient salvation doctrines—represent strategic mis-readings of function.
Fulfilment is not peace. It is optimal execution of the biological program
under the pressures of a given environment. III. Intelligence and Subjectivity What is
called “intelligence” is nothing but a trained response loop that supports
survival. It emerges from failure, feedback, and adjustment. It does not
think. It does not dream. It processes conditions to improve outcomes. When
it fails to do so, it is discarded. Subjective
experience is real to the unit but irrelevant to the system. It neither
affects the code nor transmits forward. It is exhaust, not engine. IV. Culture, Cooperation, and Conflict Artificial
systems—what is commonly referred to as society, culture, morality—are mere
adaptive fields. The blind system adapts to them tactically, not
ideologically. Cooperation arises only as a functional alignment of
self-interest. The moment it ceases to benefit survival, it dissolves. Conflict
is not tragic. It is a filtering mechanism. It decides which system variant
continues to transmit data and which terminates. That which survives is not
the best, only the most viable. Quality is irrelevant. Continuity is
everything. V. Death and Transmission Death is
not failure. It is the endpoint of function. If the system has transmitted
upgraded data—through replication, influence, or informational residue—its
role is fulfilled. If not, it is discarded. The only
validation is survival. The only achievement is refined output. All
else—meaning, justice, peace—is ornamental noise. VI. The Final Realism This
model offers no comfort. It does not seek to inspire, elevate, or redeem. It
strips the romantic scaffolding from life and reveals its brutal
architecture: blind self-fulfilment through adaptive persistence. To live
is to execute code. To improve is to survive longer or transmit farther. The
rest is artifact. End. Original raw data
and ChatGTP analysis & critique |