Departing on pilgrimage

 

 

 The pilgrim departs if and when her identity (i.e. her home and which is her sanctuary, elsewhere called a castle) changes. Her pilgrimage is over if and when she attains and stops (hence presents, or presences) as a new identity.

 

In short, a pilgrimage (i.e. a journey (i.e. an interface series) of self-change) is over when it stops (thereby coming to rest). At rest, the changed state functions as an enstasy, i.e. as a stable unit of identity capable of making whole (i.e. @1) contact.

 

Hence ending pilgrimage is a function of ending, not a function of the content being ended. In this regard see D. Hilbert’s ‘Stopping Problem’ (to wit: Entscheidungsproblem), so cleverly resolved by Turing and Church.

 

 If and when the pilgrim locks (i.e. closes, stops) either a reduced identity cluster, or an enlarged (i.e. elaborated) identity cluster (read: her self) she reaches her sanctuary (i.e. home). Each and every locked (i.e. stopped @ rest) identity cluster, real or imagined, presents as a home. Reaching home, she is rewarded with an energy surge (interpreted and made user friendly by her as (the various intensities, depending on the power of the surge) of) happiness). Non-arrival (i.e. non-closure, i.e. no leaving a disintegrating home or not closing down new data integration) is punished with energy loss (interpreted as (the various intensities of) unhappiness, depression and so on).

 

Hence, in order to sustain happiness, or even increase it (i.e. by increasing the energy surges or ‘highs’, read: enlightenments), the pilgrim, who starts falling apart (hence opening up) the moment after she arrives, must continuously (indeed, from moment to moment, hence step by step) not only change her identity (cluster) but also close (end, decide) it (thereby presenting it as a whole unit). The unintended outcome – as sine qua non - of the urge to and attainment of happiness (i.e. of an energy surplus) is therefore continuous identity (i.e. self-) change and identity closure, ending, slicing. Of course, such an identity change, or the happiness it provides, can be bought in (e.g. cosmetics, a new hat, a more powerful car that upgrades the self-esteem) all such (discrete) external self-changes resulting in happiness. Hence the boost pilgrims get from ‘shopping’ even from ‘window shopping’.

 

Actually, the pilgrim is caught between a rock and a hard place. If the pilgrim does not let go of what is already disintegrating, she goes down (in pain) with it or is driven out in pain. If she lets go voluntarily she gets an initial energy boost (i.e. a surge of happiness), soon replaced by the misery of not being able to arrive. (To overcome this misery she focuses on her ‘as if’ goal, which, actually experienced as real (in particular of intense concentration is applied, will provide and energy boost and return her to happiness).

   

(Voluntary) Letting go of an identity (bit), especially if it has produced much happiness, is painful, and therefore resisted. Only experienced, self-disciplined pilgrims and who have - like, for instance, the Buddha - grasped the wisdom of deferring (or rejecting) pleasure and/or of hiding their identity with the intention of progressing faster toward their goal (following the adage, ‘She who hides well, lives well’), can do that. In the normal course of development toward, that is to say, into/as a new true self (for ‘a self’ read: a differential unit of bio-mass), letting go of identity bits that hamper progress (in Christian speak: sin, indeed sinning) only happens when the pilgrim is under duress/stress, hence is forced to let go. After all, letting go, i.e. departing, hence opening up is extremely dangerous.

 

In short, departure means: (voluntary or involuntary) hiving or cutting off identity bits that impede progress towards the goal; then, adding and integrating data bits that cluster to form a wholly coherent, new (meaning relatively different) identity. The pilgrim’s pilgrimage is virtually over (i.e. ended, decided) when she stops (i.e. brings to rest, i.e. @ maximum anti-entropy) her new identity; her pilgrimage is actually over (i.e. ended, decided) if and when she collides/interfaces her virtual, @rest identity with that of another pilgrim, @ contact both virtual pilgrimage endings (hence identities) becoming absolutely real (for each pilgrim).

 

Acknowledging departure