What the Tathagata taught

 

 

The Tathagata taught nothing!

 

The Tathagata taught   NO! THING!

Note the recently emerged correct translation of the name Tathagata, to wit: ‘Gone beyond thus’ (or that, or this, i.e. gone beyond the notion (and experience) of thus, thereby being liberated to nirvana).

 

The Tathagata merely pointed to the obvious fact, obvious to adolescents (who can relativise) but not to infants (who can merely quantise), namely that THINGS happened as emerged rather than absolute phenomena.

 

In other words, he demonstrated that a thing (Pali: samkara) had no own quality (read: permanent substance, German: Eigen-schaft) but happened as the after-effect of the interaction of conditions (i.e. of other samkaras) which also had no own (German: eigen) quality (or substance), …. ad infinitum. In short, a thing has no own (read: atta) substance, i.e. no original element unique (i.e. peculiar) to itself.

 

He explained all in the anatta part of the 3 characteristics sutta. His explanation reappeared centuries later as the Mahayana, frills and whistles elaborated Diamond Sutra, and in the bare essentials version of the Heart Sutra.