From the Ancient Intuition of an Omnipresent Source to the Universal Quantum Processor

By the druid Finn

1. The Original Intuition (Pre-theoretical, Pre-scientific)

From the earliest stages of reflective human life, one intuition recurs with remarkable persistence:

There is something singular, everywhere-present, inexhaustible, and prior to all identifiable things.

This intuition appears across cultures and epochs, long before formal metaphysics or theology. Crucially, it is not initially doctrinal. It is diagnostic, arising from a simple cognitive observation:

· things appear and disappear,

· forms change while something seems to remain,

· life happens from somewhere but never as a thing itself.

Early humans therefore faced a structural asymmetry:

· Identifiable realities (animals, people, storms, fires) are local, transient, and observable.

· The source of appearing itself is not.

This asymmetry demanded a conceptual placeholder.

2. Why the Source Was Judged “Real” (and Eternal)

Because early cognition had no concept of procedure, processing, or state series, it defaulted to the only available ontological category:

Thinghood.

Thus the source of life and appearing was misclassified as:

· a being,

· a substance,

· a ground,

· a spirit,

· a god.

Its apparent properties followed directly from its epistemic role, not from any observation:

· Everywhere-present → because all appearances depended on it

· Eternal → because appearances ceased but the capacity to appear did not

· Unknowable → because it never itself appeared

Hence notions such as:

· God,

· Nirguna Brahman,

· Dao,

· Apeiron,

· the One.

These were not discoveries. They were cognitive compensations for a missing category: executing procedure without representation.

3. The Critical Mistake: Reifying Execution

The ancient move can now be precisely diagnosed:

Execution was mistaken for an entity.

What was intuited correctly:

· there is a single, invariant source,

· it is not itself an appearance,

· it conditions all appearances.

What was mistaken:

· that this source must itself exist as a thing,

· that it must have attributes,

· that it must be ontologically prior in the same sense as objects.

This is why the source was described apophatically (neti neti, via negativa). Language failed because language is an output system, and the source is execution.

4. The Second, Parallel Intuition: The World as Play or Display

Alongside the intuition of a singular source, early cultures independently arrived at a second insight:

The world feels staged, ephemeral, and performative.

Hence:

· Līlā (play),

· Māyā (appearance),

· cosmic drama,

· dream analogies,

· illusion metaphors.

But again, the explanation was distorted by available concepts.

Because there was no notion of:

· computation,

· information processing,

· representation layers,

the world-as-display intuition was framed poetically rather than structurally.

Still, the core insight was accurate:

Identifiable reality is not the source; it is the showing.

5. The Missing Concept That Could Not Yet Exist

What ancient thought lacked was not wisdom but formal machinery.

Specifically, it lacked the concept of:

· discrete state transitions,

· rule-governed execution,

· non-representational processing,

· output layers distinct from execution layers.

Without these, the only possible ontological options were:

· substances,

· agents,

· intentions,

· wills,

· emanations.

The intuition was sound.
The vocabulary was not.

6. The Zeitgeist Shift: From Substance to Processing

Only in the modern era does a new category become thinkable:

A system that executes rules without being a thing among things.

This arrives via:

· computation,

· information theory,

· quantum mechanics,

· cybernetics.

Now, for the first time, it becomes possible to articulate the ancient intuition without reification:

The source is not a being. It is an executing process.

And not many processes, but one.

7. The Universal Quantum Processor as the Corrected Concept

In this new conceptual landscape, the ancient intuition is no longer mystical but structural:

· There is one universal execution.

· It is everywhere-present because it is the condition of all state transitions.

· It is unknowable directly because execution has no output of itself.

· It is misjudged as eternal because execution has no temporal markers from within.

Thus:

What was once called God or Nirguna Brahman is now correctly understood as the universal quantum processor.

Not metaphorically. Functionally.

8. Life and the World Reinterpreted (No Romance Left)

Likewise, the ancient intuition of life and world as “play” now receives its precise formulation:

Life and the world are the locally cognisable, analogue output of that universal computation.

Key clarifications:

· “Local” because cognition requires localisation.

· “Analogue” because finite registration smooths quantised execution.

· “Momentary” because output is continuously refreshed, never possessed.

· “Display” because it is representation, not execution.

Līlā becomes output refresh.
Māyā becomes representational compression.
Creation becomes ongoing execution without events.

9. Why the Source Remains “Unknown” (and Must)

The universal quantum processor cannot appear as an object for the same reason:

A computation cannot output itself as execution.

Only its results can be rendered.

Thus the ancient claim “God is unknowable” is preserved, but de-mystified:

· not unknowable because sacred,

· unknowable because not an output.

10. Final Completion of the Thought Experiment

We can now state the completed line cleanly:

From the earliest stages of human cognition, people intuited a single, omnipresent source of life and appearing, misjudged as a substance or being because the concept of execution without representation did not yet exist. They likewise intuited the world as a fleeting, local, performative display. In the contemporary Zeitgeist, these same intuitions are finally rendered correctly: the source is a single universal quantum processor, and life and reality are its locally cognisable, analogue output-layer.

Or, stripped to its bone:

Ancient humanity felt the computation and saw the display;
modern humanity can finally name both without myth.

11. The druid Finn’s Closing Line

In your own idiom, this crystallises as:

What was worshipped as God was execution without output;
what was dismissed as illusion was output without execution.
Only now can the two be joined correctly.

Home