The Village and the Truth-Bearer

A procedural analysis of expulsion as an invariant survival algorithm

By the druid Finn

0. What the image is

The image is not “about” medieval cruelty, nor about disease, nor even about Christianity in any doctrinal sense. It is a compressed diagram of a recurrent procedure that appears wherever an emergent system must preserve its operational identity under threat.

In the druid’s Procedure Monism terms: the image is a snapshot of a whole token (the village) executing a boundary-maintenance routine against a perturbation (i.e. as update or structural reboot) that cannot be metabolised. The perturbation is signified by two labels:

· “Why?” = a destabilising query (a crack in the local story)

· “He has the TRUTH” = a classification that justifies removal (a stabilising label)

The outcast man is not primarily a person. He is a carrier-state: “truth-bearing” as (given) procedural contamination.

1. The scene’s grammar: three actors, one real protagonist

1.1 The crowd (the system’s distributed body)

The crowd is not a mob in the moral sense; it is the village functioning as an immune system. Its anger, fists, and coordinated motion depict an emergent consensus action.

Key diagnostic: there are children and a dog.

· Children = the routine is inherited, not reasoned.

· Dog = the routine is instinctive and alignment-seeking.

The image insists: this is a species-level algorithm, not an ideology that requires philosophers.

1.2 The authority figure (the system’s executive interface)

The white-haired figure in the black robe with staff is the “API” between diffuse impulse and authorised action. In many myths he is priest, elder, judge, shaman, physician, official.

His role is not to invent the pattern but to:

· legitimate it (“this is permitted”)

· coordinate it (“now”)

· symbolise it (“for the good of the whole”)

In Procedure Monism: he is a meta-stabiliser—a local subroutine that reduces internal friction so the whole can act as one.

1.3 The outcast (the perturbation with a vector)

The outcast’s posture is crucial. He is turned away, walking rightward. He is not debating. He is not pleading. This removes sentimentality and makes the scene formally legible:

· He is a vector leaving the system

· He is the waste-channel of the village

The village is “purifying” itself by exporting a problematic state.

1.4 The real protagonist: the boundary

The real protagonist is the boundary: fence line, village edge, inside/outside distinction.

The boundary is not geometry; it is identity.

· Inside = “we”

· Outside = “not-we”

· Crossing = the procedure by which “we” stays coherent

This is why the scene is older than medieval art. It appears in nomad camps, city-states, temples, tribes, and online communities. The architecture changes; the boundary function persists.

2. The two speech bubbles: the whole myth in two tokens

2.1 “Why?” — the rupture

This “Why?” is not directed to the outcast. It sits within the crowd, indicating something much sharper:

The system contains an internal question it cannot answer without destabilising itself.

“Why?” is what appears when:

· the local narrative no longer fully explains the local action,

· but the action is still required for survival.

In other words, “Why?” is the symptom of a mismatch between:

· felt necessity (we must expel)

· available explanation (we cannot say why without breaking the story)

This is an important invariant: systems rarely expel because they have perfect reasons; they expel because they have non-negotiable pressures that exceed their representational capacity.

2.2 “He has the TRUTH” — the containment label

This second bubble answers the first, but not by explaining. It answers by classifying.

This is the move every coherent system makes when it cannot integrate a destabilising signal:

· it turns an unassimilable content into a removable container.

“Truth” here does not mean “correct proposition.” It means:

An invariant constraint made explicit inside a local, partial run.

Truth is dangerous not because it is wrong, but because it is complete in a way the local run cannot tolerate.

3. Why “truth” behaves like disease in emergent systems

The image fuses two categories—disease and truth—because procedurally they share a property:

They are contagious states that can propagate without asking permission.

A biological pathogen replicates within the host. A “truth” (in the druid’s sense) replicates within the host narrative:

· It reduces degrees of freedom.

· It dissolves comforting fictions.

· It collapses rhetorical options.

A stable local identity requires:

· selective attention,

· controlled ignorance,

· narrative buffers,

· timing.

A truth that is too direct removes buffers and timing. It forces the system to face its generator—its constraints—too nakedly.

So the village’s immune response triggers.

Not because the village is evil.
Because the village is a finite, coherent emergent whose survival requires partiality.

4. Christ as the Christian variation of the same algorithm

The druid’s notion reading is structurally exact: the Christian version is the outcast on the cross with the claim “I am the truth.”

In this register, crucifixion is not about divine transaction but about local coherence under threat:

· A local system can tolerate prophets, teachers, even miracle-workers.

· What it cannot tolerate is an instance that says:
I am the invariant rule speaking inside your (variant) run.

That collapses the protective gap between:

· unknowable generator (constraint field)

· local application (the lived, partial emergent)

If the generator is made fully explicit inside the application, the application risks dissolving as an application. It becomes “swallowed up in structure,” as the druid put it.

So the system chooses the only remaining action:

Remove the carrier of explicit invariance.

The cross is the village boundary made vertical.

5. The deep procedural claim which the druid makes

He is not saying “humans hate truth.” He is saying something sharper and, in Procedure Monism, more fundamental:

Identifiable reality depends on a managed separation between local run and universal rule.

If the separation collapses, so does local identity.

So the local system does what any bounded emergent must do:

· preserve its operational form,

· defend its narrative membrane,

· export destabilising invariance.

This is not morality. It is mechanics.

6. Examples across domains (same structure, new costumes or cosmetics)

6.1 Scientific communities

A community can tolerate anomalies until anomalies threaten the organising paradigm. When they do, the truth-bearer is often relabelled:

· “crank,” “unserious,” “dangerous,” “unfundable”
Not because the claim is false, but because it is systemically expensive.

6.2 Families

The “identified patient” (the one who says what nobody says) often gets expelled emotionally or literally:

· “Why are you like this?”

· “You’re ruining everything.”
Truth becomes “negativity.”

6.3 Institutions

Whistleblowers are treated as traitors even when accurate:

· The institution must preserve itself as an institution.

· Truth, if fully integrated, would require structural reconfiguration.
So the person is removed to keep the system’s shape.

6.4 Online communities

Truth behaves like infection:

· a destabilising post,

· a clarifying question (“Why?”),

· the label (“troll,” “misinformation,” “bad faith”),

· expulsion (ban, block, pile-on).

Again: not because every ban is wrong, but because the procedure is invariant.

7. The image’s most important hidden move: the crowd’s self-justification loop

Look carefully at what the bubbles do.

Without them, the image is “violence.”
With them, it becomes “logic.”

The village is shown producing two internal tokens:

1. a destabiliser: Why?

2. a stabiliser: He has the TRUTH

This is the loop:

rupture → label → expulsion → restored coherence

The label does not resolve the rupture; it converts rupture into a reason to act.

That is ancient. That is political. That is religious. That is biological.

8. The druid’s Procedure Monism formulation

The invariant stated in the druid’s preferred terms:

· The village is a whole iteration seeking equilibrium.

· The outcast is a state that threatens equilibrium by making constraints explicit.

· The authority figure is a meta-rule that speeds convergence of the crowd into one action.

· Expulsion is the ejection operator that preserves the whole’s identity.

A crisp law-like compression:

When an emergent cannot metabolise an invariant constraint, it exports the constraint-bearer.

Or, in the druid’s sharper phrasing:

The local, known application must defend itself from being annihilated in structure without identifiable reality.

9. Druidic distillation

The village does not kill the man because he is wrong.
It removes him because he is unabsorbable.
Truth is not a message.
Truth is a solvent.

Home