Abstract framework for goal
achievement by the
Druid Finn 1. Initialization (Setting the Procedure) ·
Abstract function:
Establish the starting condition. ·
Purpose: Define that there is a
goal; create a bounded context in which pursuit begins. ·
Without it: No procedure runs, no
orientation occurs. 2. Coherence (Reducing Dispersion) ·
Abstract function: Align
energy and attention; suppress competing fluctuations. ·
Purpose: Create single-minded focus
that allows processing power to converge on the goal. ·
Without it: Effort dissipates in
randomness; noise overrides signal. 3. Application (Directed Contact) ·
Abstract function: Channel
coherent processing into action. ·
Purpose: Produce discrete events —
strikes, steps, experiments — that test and register progress. ·
Without it: Potential remains unactualised; the goal stays imagined. 4. Embodiment (Becoming the Goal) ·
Abstract function:
Stabilize identity with the achieved outcome. ·
Purpose: Internalize success so the
goal is no longer external but lived as reality. ·
Without it: Results dissolve back into
flux; nothing is consolidated. Optional 5. Iteration (Re-Initialization) ·
Abstract function: Loop
back; begin anew with a higher or adjusted aim. ·
Purpose: Sustain growth; turn one
embodied success into the foundation for the next. 👉 In short: This
abstract sequence maps the Patanjali’s Yoga Sūtras
1 - 4 onto universal goal achievement: the same algorithm applies whether
stabilizing the mind, writing a book, cooking a pizza or evolving a
life-form. The Natural Procedure of Goal-Achievement and
Release Abstracting the essence of Patanjali’s Yoga
Sutras 1 to 4 The Druid’s Thought
Experiment 1. Initialization (Starting the Procedure) ·
Function: Establish a bounded aim,
orient energy toward a defined goal. ·
Investment: Energy is committed; the
system self-limits to pursue a selected outcome. 2. Coherence (Concentration of Energy) ·
Function: Suppress dispersion, align
processing in a single channel. ·
Investment: Effort accumulates as
tension — stored potential energy (mental, physical, emotional). ·
Risk: The greater the focus, the
greater the strain if unrealized. 3. Application (Contact, Action, Strikes) ·
Function: Apply coherent processing
to real-world steps. ·
Investment: Each act is an expenditure
of focused energy, deepening the tension between effort and yet-unattained
outcome. ·
Condition: Success requires repeated
contacts; failure reabsorbs energy into noise. 4. Embodiment (Becoming the Goal) ·
Function: The goal stabilizes as
lived reality; identity coincides with outcome. ·
Investment: The previously external aim
is now internalised as achieved state. 5. Release (Affective Natural Consequence of
Attainment) ·
Function: Energy invested in striving
is suddenly freed. ·
Effect: The surplus manifests
phenomenologically as joy, bliss, rapture, catharsis —alternately described
as label moksha, nirvāṇa, enlightenment. ·
Mechanism: The greater the effort and
coherence invested, the more intense the release at resolution. This is a natural feedback loop,
rewarding persistence and reinforcing survival. 6. Iteration (Re-Initialization) ·
Function: New goals emerge. The cycle
begins again, but with energy boosted by the feedback of attained joy. ·
Evolutionary Value: Systems
that loop through this cycle gain adaptive advantage, since pleasure from
attainment motivates renewed effort. Summary of the Natural Procedure Initialize
→ Cohere → Apply → Embody → Release → Iterate. ·
The procedure is not mystical but natural. ·
“Enlightenment” or “bliss” is the experiential
side of a universal survival law: the sudden release of energy no longer
required for striving. ·
Traditions spiritualise it as liberation, but in
procedural terms it is a feedback mechanism built into reality: joy is the
release of bound energy when identity stabilises in achievement. 👉 This way, even “moksha” is
not outside nature but part of a continuous algorithm — a natural law of
emergence, achievement, and release. The
Druid said: Kindly search your data base m to see if anyone
else has proposed or come close to proposing such a natural law of emergence,
achievement and release. ChatGPT replied: Short
answer: I don’t find a single, canonical “natural law of emergence →
achievement → release” that unifies coherence, contact/attainment,
and affective discharge as one algorithm across physics, biology, and
psychology. But several well-known lines of work each capture major pieces
of what you propose: ·
Task tension → completion → relief
(Gestalt/field theory). Lewin’s school (via the Zeigarnik effect)
holds that unfinished goals create a tension system that is relieved
at completion—anticipating your “stored energy” and its release. WikipediaSimply Psychology ·
Control theory of self-regulation. Carver
& Scheier model goals as feedback loops; affect is feedback about rate
of discrepancy reduction (progress). Positive affect when closing the
gap—closer to your “boost” at or near attainment; “coasting” after success
echoes release. Google Booksgoal-lab.psych.umn.eduCambridge University Press &
Assessment ·
Dopamine as reward-prediction error. Phasic
dopamine spikes at unpredicted/achieved reward and shifts to cues as learning
accrues; this is a neurobiological substrate for the sudden affective
payoff at attainment. SciencePMC ·
Insight (“Aha!”) as intrinsically rewarding.
Neuroimaging shows insight solutions carry their own reward signal,
i.e., a rapid hedonic discharge when a problem resolves—your
“release” in microcosm. PubMedScienceDirect ·
Goal-gradient & post-reinforcement pause. Effort
accelerates near the finish line (stored energy focusing), followed by a pause
after reward—another behavioral signature of
release. SAGE Journalshome.uchicago.eduPMC ·
Opponent-process dynamics. After
intense striving or arousal, an opposite state (relief/pleasure)
rebounds—formalizing affective “let-down/let-go” after attainment. people.whitman.eduSimply Psychology ·
Predictive processing / free-energy principle. At a
very general level, systems minimize surprise (error); successful
prediction/attainment yields reduced free energy and subjective
relief/pleasure—an abstract bridge to your law. PMCMIT DirectWikipedia Bottom line ·
There isn’t (yet) a single “named law”
that stitches emergence → coherence → contact/achievement →
affective release into one procedure. ·
Your proposal integrates strands that are
usually siloed—Gestalt tension/closure, cybernetic control loops,
dopaminergic RPE, insight reward, goal-gradient, opponent-process, and active
inference—into a unified natural cycle. ·
That integrative framing (especially your
emphasis on contact/strike as the real-making moment and affective
discharge as conserved energy returning to the system) looks original
in its combination and scope. Expanded Summary of the
Thought Experiment Core Claim The
sequence Initialize → Cohere → Apply → Embody →
Release → Iterate is not a rare attainment available only to
saints, mystics, or geniuses. It is the basic adaptive procedure
available to any survival-driven system, operating across scales of
life and context. Whether photon, cell, organism, or human mind, the
algorithm describes how systems persist, adapt, and thrive in the face of
randomness. Procedural Phases 1. Initialize
(Set the Goal / Define Context). 2. Cohere
(Suppress Noise / Align Energy). 3. Apply
(Action / Contact / Strike). 4. Embody
(Become the Outcome). 5. Release
(Feedback / Affective Discharge). 6. Iterate
(Reinitialize). Universality ·
Not restricted to mystics: The same
law governs the saint meditating, the athlete training, the child learning to
walk, and the organism adapting to its niche. ·
Quantised across goals: Each
goal, problem, or survival challenge is its own cycle — a discrete packet of
effort, coherence, action, embodiment, release, and renewal. ·
Applicable in any context: Whether
facing random fluctuation (chaotic environment) or structured challenge
(rule-based game), the same steps apply. ·
Survival = adaptation via this cycle: Systems
persist by repeating it, each loop conserving identity while adapting to
change. Implication What
traditions called “enlightenment” or “rapture” is simply the affective
feedback of successful adaptation, not an extraordinary state. Every
survival-driven system is equipped with the same procedure. It is the
universal law of realness-emergence: a natural, discontinuous, iterative
algorithm by which all identities survive, adapt, and experience themselves
as real. 👉 Thus, the druid’s thought
experiment reframes Patańjali’s four opening sūtras as a four stages of a general survival
code regulating the fundamental self-adaptation loop of existence. |